INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
The value-based mission statement of Mitwelten (Co-worldings) is anchored in the ecological constitution of terrains and habitats. In the case of measures at a governmental level, it refers to areas that are still of ecological value and therefore worthy of protection. But it also applies to those areas that have been built over and colonized with human settlements or appropriated for business, transport and infrastructure. Here, the needs of the human species and its societies have so far taken absolute precedence over those of other living beings and ecosystemic relationships and biological habitats. Particularly in urban areas and as a result of supra-regional infrastructures, ecologically valuable habitats have been almost completely displaced by built-up habitats or extremely remodeled and decimated. In these areas, it is not so much a question of preserving the remaining green spaces and ecological resources, but also about establishing new building, infrastructure and economic cycles in urban planning and open space design. This includes the ‘re-naturalisation’ of the anthropogenic terrains of the advanced civilisations of the European-influenced industrial modernity of the carbon age. The restructuring process goes hand in hand with the emergence of new ways of life, which ideally produce both a new culture and a revitalized ‘material’ living environment. New strategies are needed to meet such all-encompassing demands. In this research project we explored the potential of practice-based, interdisciplinary design research and thus tried to make a contribution to combating biodiversity loss. As part of the Mitwelten research project, we have therefore put together an interdisciplinary team of experts who combine the disciplines of design and landscape architecture, ecology and systems engineering, and cultural studies. We advocate an interdisciplinary, iterative, realization-oriented and context-sensitive development process. Based on objectives, research and drafts, measures are derived that are tested through experimental realizations and evaluations and then adapted and reviewed in subsequent cycles until principles can be derived. Through empirical links between analysis and design, carefully negotiated specifications and scenarios as well as a joint cultural learning and education process, impact is to be achieved and communicated.
FOUR PHASES OF FIELD RESEARCH
Situational Analysis
The field studies are based on ecological and cultural concepts and methods. To gain insights into the ecological situations, we integrated various technological sensor systems into three field studies and conducted surveys. The monitoring and surveys were recorded and analyzed using statistical methods and artificial intelligence.
Media-ecological Design Interventions
Based on the findings of the situational analysis, we created media-ecological design concepts and finally presented the results by means of interactive media applications. Interspecies platforms and participative installations were developed to raise public awareness for fragile ecological systems, but also to give plants and animals a voice and to create new forms of cross-species coexistence.
Mixed Methods Evaluation
The empirical design process and its impact on the environmental actors were observed and evaluated. Through an iterative development process the media-ecological design was improved and documented for reproduction.
Conclusions
From the results of the evaluations, we derived best practices and the overall concepts were theoretically reflected. Under the guiding principle of biodiversity, they integrate and link:
- content-related design aspects (e.g. scenario development, data mapping design, sensor-actuator composition, audio-visualization, contact zone design, gamification),
- aspects of the technological implementation of the IoT toolkit (e.g. feasibility, data evaluation, ecosystem performance),
- and ecological-cultural integration and effectiveness (e.g. acceptance, sustainability, connectivity, attractiveness, usability, mediation content).
INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM & COOPERATION
Jan Torpus:
design and art research (project development, project management)
Prof. Thomas Amberg:
computer science, “maker”, IoT (tech. project management)
Felix Gerloff:
cultural and media studies (project development)
Dr. Daniel Küry:
biology, ecology, lifescience.ch
Prof. Dr. Christoph Küffer:
urban ecology, open space planning, environmental humanities
Cedric Spindler:
computer science, audiovisual media, data analysis
Dr. Ines Schauer:
molecular biology, ecological settlement design
Timeo Wullschleger:
computer science, data analysis, automation
Andri Wild:
computer science, dataViz
Rebecca Geyer:
geography, process design (research assistant)
Field study partners:
Dr. Lisa Eggenschwiler (Merian Gärten); Christina Felle (FHNW Hochschule für Gestaltung und Kunst); Prof. em. Dr. Andreas Erhardt, Marc Bayard and Yannick Bucher (Reinacher Heide).
Project partner:
Swild, Dr. Sandra Gloor, Dr. Fabio Bontadina (urban ecology, wildlife research, communication)
Students of the IMVS:
Thushyanthan Saravani, Mithusan Sivakumar, Patrick Gutter, Tobias Villiger, Marc Bugmann, Tobias Kunz, Simon Matile.
Scientific Advisory Board:
Prof. Dr. Christiane Heibach, Prof. Dr. Claudia Mareis, Prof. Dr. Birgit Schneider, Dr. Eva Spehn, Prof. Dr. Evi Zemanek.